<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PMA was a dissapointment for many Nikon fans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/</link>
	<description>Technology, Linux, Photography, Science, Cycling, Outdoor Activities and other interests.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:50:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen George</title>
		<link>http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 23:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
...and the best runner-up probably being the Pentax...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That was facetious right?  &#039;Cause all fanaticism aside, I don&#039;t quite see the support for &lt;em&gt;Pentax&lt;/em&gt; being a runner-up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8230;and the best runner-up probably being the Pentax&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>That was facetious right?  &#8216;Cause all fanaticism aside, I don&#8217;t quite see the support for <em>Pentax</em> being a runner-up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mecworks.com/articles/2005/02/24/pma-was-a-dissapointment-for-many-nikon-fans/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>As an avid follower of the digital SLR cameras, and a very satisfied owner of a Canon 10D, I don&#039;t see why you would be so set on a Nikon. With Canon setting the benchmark, and the best runner-up probably being the Pentax, unless you have a whole bagfull of lenses, waiting for the Nikon seems somewhat illogical. 

On a side note, the Speedlite 420 and 550 make a great combination for lighting solutions. They&#039;re a great investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an avid follower of the digital SLR cameras, and a very satisfied owner of a Canon 10D, I don&#8217;t see why you would be so set on a Nikon. With Canon setting the benchmark, and the best runner-up probably being the Pentax, unless you have a whole bagfull of lenses, waiting for the Nikon seems somewhat illogical. </p>
<p>On a side note, the Speedlite 420 and 550 make a great combination for lighting solutions. They&#8217;re a great investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

